Cell phone radiation causes cancer. Cell phone radiation studies have been growing that support that cell phone radiation causes cancer and the word is spreading.
There is a long-held concern that youths who eat a lot of fast food are at risk for becoming overweight. New research presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) annual meeting in Boston shows that greater familiarity with fast-food restaurant advertising on television is associated with obesity in young people.
You hear from Big Tobacco Playbook hacks and shills for the electronic transmission industry, wifi and cell phones there is no evidence on the danger of such exposure, initially or cumulatively, but they are LIARS, see the attached.
~ Uncle Russ
In a study of the effects of cell phone usage on brain cell activity, NIH scientists and their colleagues at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Brookhaven National Laboratory found that 50 minutes of cell phone usage (with the phone muted to avoid confounding effects from auditory stimulation) elevated brain glucose metabolism significantly in the parts of the brain closest to the phone’s antenna.
In the attached article, you see the beginning of the end of fraud “biologics” in Big Pharma.
You might be asking what a “film” or photo company has to do with drugs?
Just like Roche Pharmaceuticals had distributed tycopherols, for synthetic Vitamin E, a chemical film derivative from now bankrupt Kodak of Rochester, NY, so too products that do not work, or harm, are outed in Asia, in the attached article
The take away message here is synthetic vitamins DO NOT WORK!
Such fake and non absorbable vitamins (to keep you sick to sell you more costly and deadly drugs) often marketed as “biologics”, “natural identical”, “biosimilar”, and other fake marketing terms, deceive and defraud consumers, to think such products are safe or effective, when they are not.
Read BAD PHARMA by Ben Goldacre and THE TRUTH ABOUT THE DRUG COMPANIES by Dr Marcia Angell, MD, Retired Editor and Chief of The New England Journal Of Medicine.
~ Uncle Russ
The Japanese joint venture between Dr. Reddy’s and Fujifilm has been called-off though both say future collaboration remains likely, especially in API production.
Radiation from a mobile phone call can make brain regions near the device burn more energy, according to a new study.
In some quarters the specter of cancer-causing cell phones refuses to be put to rest — or even to be temporarily stilled while new studies are conducted.
When an active cell phone is pressed against the ear, the brain gets busier.
Here’s one number to keep in mind during your next cell phone conversation: 50. A new experiment shows that spending 50 minutes with an active phone pressed up to the ear increases activity in the brain. This brain activity probably doesn’t make you smarter. When cell phones are on, they emit energy in the form of radiation that could be harmful, especially after years of cell phone usage. Scientists don’t know yet whether cell phones are bad for the brain. Studies like this one are attempting to find out.
Self-admitted eugenicist Bill Gates, financier of fake genetically modified cancer causing fake eggs, wants to kill your wives and daughters faster, with the DUMB BRA, radiating breasts, just like cancer causing cell phones, to give your female family members cancer faster.
This (note sarcasm) will be followed by the LIMP JOCK STRAP, to increase sterility and erectile dysfunction.
Of course (note continued sarcasm) it will allow Bill Gates to market (along with his autism causing line of vaccines and boosters), phony philanthropic charity, that is actual profit seeking mass murder.
Bill Gates, delivering genocide, and crappy software, since the 1980’s.
~ Uncle Russ
It’s no longer enough to have smartphones, smartwatches, smart TVs and smart cars. Now a tech company is bringing artificial intelligence to lingerie.
Researchers at Microsoft have developed a prototype of a “smart bra” embedded with physiological sensors that seek to monitor a woman’s heart activity to track her emotional moods and combat overeating. The sensors can signal the wearer’s smartphone, which then flash a warning message to help her step away from the fridge and make better diet decisions.
Microsoft developed a ‘smart’ bra
In senate hearing Interphone Witnesses had testified about research into mobile phone / cell phone use and its potential impact on human health, as well as the potential side effects such as brain cancer and salivary gland tumors.
Remember that classic “this is your brain on drugs” commercial, with the egg frying in a pan? If you soon see a “this is your brain on cell phones” clip, don’t say we didn’t warn you: Cell phone radiation may be slowly sautéing your noodle, finds new research published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
If you think the jury’s still out on whether cell phones can be dangerous to your health, then you might want to take the time to listen to this video from the Environmental Health Trust (www.ehtrust.org). Dr. Devra Davis, author of “Disconnect–The Truth About Cellphone Radiation,” has been researching the safety hazards of radiation emanating from your cell phone.
The loud ringing tone on my simple handy cell phone did not make fun for my friends to laugh at me.
Rather, the type of cell phone I pulled out from my side pocket to receive the call created the fun which sent my friends into frenzy.
BUY NOTHING FROM COMMIE GODLESS EVIL EMPIRE RED CHINA!
Country of origin labeling must be required, vote for no politician who does not immediately require this and vote out all incumbents that have FAILED to get rid of cancer causing genetically modified seeds, crops, livestock, drugs, beverage, ingredients, flavors and food POISONING YOU AND YOUR FAMILY!
~ Uncle Russ
As the author of the insightful, prophetic book “1984,” even George Orwell’s discussed “surveillance society” wasn’t so sinister as to include kitchen appliances. But thanks to the continued miniaturization of technology, snooping devices and those designed to disrupt wireless operations are proliferating at an unbelievable pace.
The Federal Communications Commission should review its cell phone radio-frequency (RF) exposure limit, which was set 15 years ago, because it does not include testing for potential harm from holding phones directly against the body or factor in the latest research, a government report recommended today.
Children and heavy users of mobile phones should limit their exposure to the devices, France’s safety watchdog advised, despite concluding that there was “no proven effect” on health.
The National Agency for Health, Food and Environmental Safety (Anses) said it would make a recommendation to limit exposure to the devices, with heavy use defined as 40 minutes of conversation a day.
Public Health minister Laurette Onkelinx has announced that sales of mobile phones to children under 7 years will be banned in shops and also on the internet.
Adverts for mobile phones during children’s programmes on TV radio and the internet will also be banned.
Insurers stop covering for cell phone use, called the next ‘casualty catastrophe’ after tobacco and asbestos; phone manufacturers hit with a class action and personal lawsuits; and the warning deep inside your mobile.
Over the last decade the use of cellphones has increased dramatically among the young adolescent population. In New Zealand, most children of this age also use a cordless phone. With the rapid proliferation in children‘s use of these devices, there has been increasing concern about whether children are more vulnerable than adults to possible adverse outcomes if such effects do result from wireless phone radiofrequency exposure.
As cell phone radiation lawsuits (http://www.consumerinjurylawyers.com/cell-phone-radiation-lawsuit.html) continue to move forward in courts around the U.S., Bernstein Liebhard LLP notes a French safety watchdog has issued new recommendations regarding the use of cell phones by children. According to a report published by The Telegraph, the National Agency for Health, Food and Environmental Safety (Anses) has advised that children and heavy users of cell phones (defined as anyone who uses a mobile phone for more than 40 minutes per day) limit their exposure to the devices.*
While much has been made about the health effects of smart meters, there is another device, even more widely used, that could be every bit as dangerous as what has been ascribed to the utility device.
As a multitude of hazardous wireless technologies are deployed in homes, schools, and workplaces, government officials and industry representatives continue to insist on their safety despite growing evidence to the contrary. Extensive deployment of “smart grid” technology hastens this looming health crisis.
We have already established that Healthcare.gov is not a functioning database application that allows people to shop for competing health plans. It is actually a government-run Trojan Horse that suckers people into creating accounts where they hand over:
Warning: Enrolling in Obamacare allows government to link your IP address with your name, social security number, bank accounts and web surfing habits
US research reveals that 4 out of 5 college student drivers have used their cell phones to send or receive text messages while driving despite the majority recognizing that the activity represents a risk. Garold Lantz and Sandra Loeb of the McGowan School of Business, at King’s College, in Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania, found that male drivers are more likely to engage in texting while driving but consider themselves more proficient drivers than others and so less likely to endanger themselves or others while doing so.
HELSINKI, Finland, October 17, 2013 — The French cell phone safety watchdog – The National Agency for Health, Food and Environmental Safety (ANSES) – published its new report on cell phones and health on October 15th, 2013.
What Causes the Damage? The part of the electromagnetic spectrum used by cell phones and other wireless devices to communicate does not occur naturally on the earths surface — logically, it has to be, or there would be too much interference for cell phones to work.
Anyone telling you there is no correlation and causation between wifi technology, such as cell phones and cell phone towers or home wifi devices, and cancer, is a criminal liar.
~ Uncle Russ
A Swedish study on the use of wireless phones, including cell phones and cordless phones, has uncovered a link between electromagnetic radiation exposures and the risk of malignant and non-malignant brain tumors.
Based upon recent findings, the BC CDC recommends that males keep cell phones away from the groin area and limit mobile phone use. The report confirms that there is consistent evidence that exposure to testes is associated with reduced sperm count, motility, concentration and altered cell structure.
A reminder from 3 years ago on nuking your head.
Samsung recently announce it plans to put eft (electronic frequency transmission) protection devices onto their wifi offerings, further proving the dangers!
Anyone telling you there is no initial or cumulative danger from wifi and eft exposure is a proven liar.
~ Uncle Russ
Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same “carcinogenic hazard” category as lead, engine exhaust and chloroform.
More empirical evidence on the subject covered in the attached article and citings.
Use your Speaker Phone Feature and Avoid Blue Tooth Head attachments!
Neurosurgeons and Dermatologists, I personally know, in medical practice, are reporting spikes in ear and brain cancers they “know” is a direct correlation to cell phone use and electronic frequency transmissions triggering/causing “metastasized cancers”.
~ Uncle Russ
Approximately 60,000 to 70,000 cell phones are sold each day in the United States. Over 110 million Americans use cell phones. And worldwide, it is estimated that approximately 1 billion people use cell phones.
If you post articles to your Facebook wall that warn others about the dangers of vaccines, or Tweet links to the latest studies tying vaccines to autism through Twitter, the vaccine pushers of the world could soon know about it in real time.
So if the gamma radiation on polar routes does not get you, the in flight wifi, or what feebly passes for food and beverages will.
~ Uncle Russ
(NaturalNews) WiFi connectivity is set to come to a plane journey near you if you fly Lufthansa mid-haul routes in 2014, according to news from businesstraveller.com. WiFi capable planes are part of a trend that’s still gathering pace across the entire aviation industry starting around 2009 in the United States.
Wifi on airplanes: great for airlines but not so good for fliers
Your Constitutional Rights Are Being Trampled By Uncle Sam Gone Wild At Your Tax Dollars Appropriate To Protect Big Government!
~ Uncle Russ
Congress has passed a controversial bill that will make it easier for law enforcement officials to fly unmanned drones over US airspace.
Anyone suggesting cell phones are not causing cancer to users or the environment is a liar.
~ Uncle Russ
Breast cancer occurring in women under the age of 40 is uncommon in the absence of family history or genetic predisposition, and prompts the exploration of other possible exposures or environmental risks. We report a case series of four young women—ages from 21 to 39—with multifocal invasive breast cancer that raises the concern of a possible association with nonionizing radiation of electromagnetic field exposures from cellular phones. All patients regularly carried their smartphones directly against their breasts in their brassieres for up to 10 hours a day, for several years, and developed tumors in areas of their breasts immediately underlying the phones.
The campaign by trolls on the internet, from the wifi,cell phone and power transmission industries, that there is nothing wrong with their products is a GIANT LIE.
Use your speaker phone and get a safe diode for your cell phone and take wifi router out of your homes.
~ Uncle Russ
In the video above you can listen to my powerful interview with Dr. Devra Davis, who is one of the most well-respected and credentialed researchers on the dangers of cell phones, among a number of other things.
Things do not go better with Coke…
~ Uncle Russ
Earlier this year, Coca-Cola Company rolled out an ad campaign encouraging people to unite in the fight against obesity. The irony of the situation was not lost on most people however, and the ads drew fire from consumers, consumer advocates and obesity experts1,2 alike.
Bernstein Liebhard LLP, a nationwide law firm representing consumers in cell phone radiation lawsuits, (http://www.consumerinjurylawyers.com/cell-phone-radiation-lawsuit.html) applauds a new effort by a consortium of health and consumers groups to convince U.S. government regulators to revamp cell phone radiation standards.
Keep the cell phone away from your head and body, use the speaker feature.
Children and health compromised individuals are particularly vulnerable to physical harm.
Want real wellness through proven nutrition?
GOT BRAND NEW ZIJA SMARTMIX and XM+?!
~ Uncle Russ
If you’re one of the people who has suspected cell phones/cell towers were bad news, get ready for the latest affront to our health: The 4G/LTE network. This is the latest scheme cooked up by the greedy telecommunications industry.
This just in from a leading Physicist and Electronic Engineer at a highly prestigious American University.
~ Uncle Russ
Foreign researchers are extremely excited for a biology project from five 9th grade girls.
Researchers from England, Holland and Sweden have shown great interest in the five girls’ biology experiments.
Take 400 Cress seeds and place them into 12 trays. Then place six trays in two rooms at the same temperature. Give them the same amount of water and sun over 12 days, and remember to expose half of them to mobile (Wi-Fi) radiation.
News of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA)’s covert spying activities on Americans has sent shockwaves throughout the nation, rattling what little rudiments of freedom and liberty still remain in this once great nation.
The director of a prominent cancer research institution has released cautionary words to his administrators and staff to restrain from excessive use of cell phones because of a chance of cancer, according to The Associated Press.
It’s an all too familiar scene: children, some as young as nine, spending an exorbitant amount of time on cell phones. What may not be as familiar, and therefore go unnoticed, is the sight of children who are suffering and sick from cancer, specifically brain cancer.
People who started using mobile as teenagers and have been doing so for more than a decade are at a five-fold risk of developing a common type of brain cancer, new evidence indicates.
While the proliferation of wireless devices has made accessing the internet more convenient and less obtrusive (no unsightly cables lying around), studies are now revealing the trade-offs that come with convenience. More specifically, the dangers that the widespread adoption of wireless technology has created in regards to our health. Simply put, most people underestimate the dangers of wireless technology to our health and well-being.
Keep those cell phones and wifi away from your body and exposure, electronic frequencies are radiating you and your family!
~ Uncle Russ
by Josh Mitteldorf
Posted on July 8, 2013
In the 21st Century, we live in a sea of radio waves. No one wants to think that this might have consequences for our health – there are enough things to worry about that are more within our power to change. We get plenty of encouragement not to think about the subject from the news media which, come to think of it, are not so easily distinguished from the telecomm companies. The danger is real, if not so easy to quantify, and common sense suggests we might mitigate the largest sources of risk with minimal inconvenience.
It was twelve years ago that a neighbor asked me if she should worry about exposing her teenage children to cell phone radiation. I put on my physicist’s hat and patiently explained to her the difference between ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. Radiation comes in little quantum packets, and the type of radiation corresponds to how much energy is in each packet. UV, X-rays, gamma rays and cosmic rays all pack enough energy in each photon that they can damage the complex and delicate chemicals, including DNA, on which our life depends. Radio waves are low-energy radiation. Each single packet lacks the punch to break a chemical bond, and so the only way they can affect our chemistry is if many of them act together. This (I explained) is called “heating”. Unless a radio signal is strong enough to change our temperature, then it can’t be doing any damage.
I was not alone in accepting this theoretical “proof” that non-ionizing radation can’t hurt us. Throughout the 20th Century, as radio technology was being developed with wider applications in more bands of the spectrum, scientists and regulators universally assumed it was (biologically) a benign technology.
No one, in good conscience, can think that way any more.
Studies of health hazards linked to microwaves have left the threshold of plausible deniability far behind, and it is only through an extensive program of censorship and scientific disinformation that the subject has been kept from the mainstream of public discourse. Devra Davis has worked tirelessly to advocate and educate on the connection between cell phone use and brain cancer.
So far, there has been no public health catastrophe, but (as Davis explains), there is a time lag of up to ten years before cancer develops, and the rapid rise in the use of cell phones may take a much larger toll in the coming decade.
Three important and very different questions arise:
- What can we learn about fundamental cell science from the fact that biological systems are sensitive to radio frequency?
- What practical measures can we take in our daily lives to mitigate the risk of radio waves?
- What policies and regulations should government be promoting to guide broadcasters and manufacturers of consumer devices toward safer technologies?
I’ll say a few words about the first two, and refer you to the EMR Policy Institute for the third.
What can we learn about biology?
Strong interactions between radio frequency (RF) radiation and living cells is surprising to a physicist, but perhaps not utterly mysterious. In my opinion, the most plausible theories involve resonance.
When you tune your radio to a particular station, you are programing the receiver to focus on one particular frequency, corresponding to an exact amount of energy in each quantum packet. A large number of packets confined to a particular frequency is characteristic of the way that radio communication works (including cell phones, broadcast radio, wifi and bluetooth, etc). Back in the 1970s and 80s, a German-British physicist named Herbert Fröhlich wrote some far-sighted theoretical papers about ways in which biomolecules might respond to RF radiation that happened to resonate with their vibrational frequencies. When the frequency of a radio wave corresponds to a vibrational mode for a molecule, the interaction is extra-strong, and it may be that the molecule is induced to shake violently. There are so many biomolecules and so many different broadcast channels that resonances are bound to occur by chance. If this is indeed the reason for biological effects of RF radiation, then it may be that the radio communications that surround us could be made far safer simply by prohibitions against broadcast at certain critical frequencies.
There is a related theory that RF radiation disrupts the membranes on which cells depend to maintian their structure and separate chemical constituents in different parts.
A bit of research has been done (in Croatia Croatia and India! India!) to look for signs of ways that cells respond to radio waves, starting from a purely observational approach without a theory. This ought to pique the interest of every cell biologist, and new experiments should be devised to search for fundamental new mechanisms. It is a certainty that profoundly new biology remains to be discovered if this thread is pursued.
(I have difficulty explaining why this isn’t a hot field for new research, except if I think of all the monied interests that feel threatened by research in the field.) It may be that the effects are all weak and beome manifest only over longer periods of time, and this will make the phenomena a bit harder to study. But this research promises to open a whole new field of knowledge – what are we waiting for?
What can we do to protect ourselves?
So far, we know little about which frequencies might have more effect than others. Without that information, it makes sense to look just at RF power and compare exposure from different sources – especially those over which we exert some individual control.
Radio power is measured in watts, and power density in watts per square centimeter. Think of the power from a transmitter rippling outward in an expanding sphere. As you move away from a source of RF, the power gets rapidly diluted over a larger and larger sphere. Power density is computed as the output power of the transmitter divided by the area of the sphere. I assume that it is the power density that dictates the danger, and that we would be prudent to avoid the RF sources in our environment that have the highest power density.
Cell phones – The problem with cell phones arises from the facts that (1) they need to broadcast with enough power to reach a cell phone tower up to 10 miles away, and (2) people hold them close up against the heads. The transmission power of a cell phone is limited by FCC to 2 watts, and distance to the brain is less than 1 cm. So power densities inside your head can be as high as 1 watt/cm2.
Microwave ovens – I became aware that microwave ovens leak when I noticed that I couldn’t make a Skype call or watch a Youtube video from my kitchen while the microwave oven was operating. Apparently it leaked enough to interfere with the wifi in the house. Some ovens are much leakier than others. But manufacturers don’t list leakage in their specifications, and there are no government or consumer web sites where you can find a comparison. Meanwhile, there is a thriving market in microwave meters. Meters that measure just the particular frequency from ovens are inexpensive, meters that cover a broader frequency spectrum, suitable for wifi and cell phones as well, are a few hundred dollars
But in comparison to cell phone emissions, microwave ovens tend to be much smaller. The meters measure in units of 0.001 watts/cm2, which is hundreds of times smaller than what you receive from holding a cell phone next to your head.
The most practical and effective thing you can do to minimize your RF exposure is to carry a cell phone in a purse or backpack rather than in your pocket, and use a wired headset rather than hold the phone up to your ear.
Laptop computer – Typical wifi power from a laptop computer is 0.1 watt. If you work with one of these all day long and you hold it close to your body, your computer can be the second most powerful source of RF radiation in your daily life. The remedy is to turn off the wifi in your laptop and run a network cable to your network hub, rather than relying on wifi. This can be quite practical at your desk or other work area where you habitually use the computer.
WiFi – Typical home wifi systems radiate about 1 watt. If you sit right next to the unit while you work, you could be exposing your head and body to a few milliwatts/cm2, comparable to sitting next to a leaky microwave oven.
The exposure from wifi is all over your body, and constant throughout the day spent in your home or office. How does that compare to a much higher exposure concentrated at your head for a few minutes a day that you use a cell phone? This is a big question for epidemiologists, and to my knowledge there are no reported data and no one is doing such studies at present. Tentatively (based only on fuzzy theory), I would focus on the acute, high-intensity exposure and ignore the low-intensity, chronic exposure until better data becomes available.
Microwave and cell phone towers – Typically, they radiate ~300 watts. If you live right next to one, say 100 meters, then your exposure all day long is still only a few microwatts, which is 1000 times less than the exposure from sitting next to your wifi modem or your microwave oven. These, in turn, are hundreds of times smaller than the exposure from your cell phone.
Commercial radio broadcasts – The largest of these may broadcast at 50,000 watts If you happen to be within 1 km of the Empire State Building or Twin Peaks in San Francisco, you could be receiving a few microwatts/cm2 of exposure.
The bottom line
Distance trumps power. (This is the physics of the inverse-square law.) Beware the close-up sources and don’t sweat the more powerful ones far away. Carry your cell phone away from your body, and use a wired headset. The next level of protection is provided by turning off the wifi in your laptop computer. Beyond this, you might want to stay a few feet away from your microwave oven and your wifi hub. Remember that exposure from these is likely to be ~100 times smaller than from your cell phone. Don’t worry about big broadcast towers, which expose you to radiation intensities that are ~100,000 times smaller than your cell phone.
Meanwhile, there’s an urgent need to study whole-body effects and a possible frequency dependence for the biological effects of radio waves. My suspicion is that such research is being suppressed by the telecomm industry and its political influence.
A new study, published in the February 2006 issue of the International Journal of Oncology, by Professor Lennart Hardell and colleagues shows statistically significant increases in the risk of benign brain tumors, especially acoustic neuromas, following the use of mobile telephones.
Facts Don’t Lie, But Cell Phone, Power Transmission Line, Wifi Advocates And Lobbyist Do Lie And Are DEATH MERCHANTS.
~ Uncle Russ
Cell phones have become ubiquitous in today’s society. It’s almost as if you don’t have one, then you’re not living in the 21st century.
Evidence is daily mounting on wifi and cell phone and electronic frequency transmissions causing disease, cancer, and premature death, at any exposure level.
~ Uncle Russ
They’re called wifi hotspots or wireless Internet zones. They’re inside coffeehouses, hotels, restaurants, and even buses and trains.